Skip to content Skip to footer

SEO’s Existential Crisis: How AI Is Rewriting the Web

BY BRUCE CLEVELAND

Search is changing—not incrementally, but fundamentally.

Over the past two years, search engines and AI platforms have begun routing users away from traditional websites and into generative summaries, AI chat interfaces, and answer boxes that sit atop the results page. For businesses and publishers reliant on organic search visibility, the consequences are becoming impossible to ignore.

In Q4 2024, Google’s AI Overview—a feature that uses generative AI to summarize information directly within search results—was present in 42.5% of all queries.¹ Microsoft’s Bing, powered by OpenAI’s GPT-4, saw similar engagement levels in its integrated chat interface. The shift is not merely cosmetic. A recent study by Ahrefs and eMarketer found that when an AI answer appeared, the average click-through rate (CTR) on the top-ranking organic result dropped from 5.6% to just 3.1%.²

More alarmingly, the majority of users now bypass websites entirely. SparkToro’s 2024 “Zero-Click” study found that nearly 60% of Google searches end without a click.³ That figure is up from 50% just a few years earlier. For publishers, the impact is profound. HubSpot experienced up to an 80% decline in traffic on top-of-funnel educational content.⁴ A popular DIY blog, Charleston Crafted, lost 70% of its Google traffic—and 65% in ad revenue—in one month following the rollout of AI summaries.⁵

These aren’t anomalies. They’re early signals of a systemic shift. The classic “10 blue links” paradigm is giving way to AI-derived digest summaries and conversational overviews that leave little reason for users to continue browsing.

The End of Traditional SEO as We Knew It

This evolution is not just technical; it’s behavioral.

Users increasingly treat search engines as conversational agents. While a typical Google query may average three to five words, prompts to ChatGPT and other LLM-based tools now exceed 20 words on average.⁶ These expansive, context-rich prompts demand much more than keyword-matching—they compel agents to synthesize across sources, extract key relational insights, and deliver a plain-language answer that satisfies the user immediately.

For many informational queries, content is no longer an entry point—it’s an ingredient. And those ingredients are often blended, with little credit or click incentive passed to the original publisher.

The implications are clear. Ranking first in search no longer guarantees visibility. Even standout content may become invisible when obscured beneath an AI-rendered sentence that encapsulates it. The link may be there—but fewer people are clicking.

What’s more, even sites that provide trusted, accurate information may see their traffic siphoned by language models that repackage their expertise without attribution. A 2024 case study involving the World History Encyclopedia revealed a 25% traffic loss attributed to Google summarizing their content within an answer box.⁷ The CEO described the dynamic succinctly: when AI outputs “summarize your content better than your website,” the value proposition of publishing erodes—and the implicit contract of the open web begins to fracture.

From Optimization to Translation

Rather than optimizing for keywords, businesses must now translate their value clearly and structurally—for both humans and language models.

This is the basis of Agentic Search Engine Optimization, or ASEO: a dual-channel, semantically aligned strategy that ensures your content is consumable and intelligible across both human and AI interpreters.

Effective adaptation requires three shifts in mindset:

  1. Favor clarity and compressibility over complexity. Agents reward structure: ordered lists, feature grids, standalone summaries, and declarative comparisons fare better than discursive prose.
  2. Rebalance visibility metrics. Measuring click-through rate and keyword rank is no longer sufficient. New indicators—such as citation inclusion in AI summaries, branded search lift, or changes in post-impression conversion rate—are emerging as proxies for influence
  3. Diversify distribution. Organic search alone can no longer carry the weight of discovery. Sites thriving in this new model are investing in owned channels (email, video, courses, forums) and adapting their content for multiple surfaces—web, voice, chat, and LLM ingestion points.

Finally, attribution matters. Structured data, schema markup, markdown indexes (/llms.txt), and semantic consistency help ensure that when AI models do borrow from your site, they reference you accurately—and, when possible, visibly.

A New Playbook for AI-Era Discoverability

If SEO was once about optimizing for machines by understanding human behavior, ASEO is about optimizing for machines who themselves simulate human behavior. It requires you to surface what matters most about what you offer—not for the user to find it, but for the machine to represent it. And that representation must be earned.

This article summarizes the threats and inflection points. To support adaptation, Innovation Algebra and Traction Gap Partners have worked together to release a practical resource: the ASEO Best Practices Guide, which outlines agent-ready content patterns, modern metadata strategies, dual-channel tagging instructions, and AI parsing logic—without requiring any specialized technical tooling.

The reshaping of search is already underway. The question is not whether we optimize for agents—but whether we remain visible at all.

Request a copy of the Agentic SEO Guide and a custom Agentic SEO (ASEO) report for your website here.

***

¹ Source: Search Engine Journal, CTR study, Q4 2024 ² Source: Ahrefs + eMarketer benchmarking, 2025 ³ Source: SparkToro, 2024 Zero-Click Update ⁴ Source: Semrush analysis via Nonprofit News Feed (2025) ⁵ Source: CMSWire / eWeek interview, 2024 ⁶ Source: Exploding Topics report on prompt length vs. query patterns, 2025 ⁷ Source: CMSWire, World History Encyclopedia case, 2024

Go to Top